3/9/2023 0 Comments Trending news facebook![]() ![]() That contempt for editors is proving ironic, however, because it’s exactly the soft and controlled hand of a good editor that Trending needs most. But as a Gizmodo report from last May makes clear, Trending was largely managed by a team of very human editors and reporters selecting links from those most frequently shared across the platform.Īs the report notes, however, the disdain Facebook held for media types came across in the treatment of these curators, who described “grueling work conditions, humiliating treatment, and a secretive, imperious culture in which they were treated as disposable outsiders.” These same editors probably didn’t help themselves when they revealed they had routinely acted against conservative news sources, but Facebook nonetheless fired them last week in a bid to cleanse itself of the issue. ![]() When Facebook first introduced Trending, it might have been easy to assume it was managed through sheer mathematical rigor and analysis of Facebook users, much like Twitter’s list of trending topics upon which Trending is largely based. That’s why Facebook should abandon the Trending section altogether. Whether curated by a professional editorial staff or left to the cold logical hands of an algorithm, Facebook has proven itself completely unwilling and unqualified to match the responsibility it now has to the average news consumer with any sense of editorial authority. A misleading or outright false article reaching the front of Trending effectively gives it more publicity than if it were published on CNN, the New York Times, or Fox News. ![]() But Facebook was silent.That would all be silly and in good fun if Facebook did not have so much control over where and how people get their news. “They communicated with each other to spread hate, they organized campaigns through Facebook. “We believe that the genocide against Rohingya was possible only because of Facebook,” Sawyeddollah said. seeking $150 billion for Rohingya refugees, has so far refused. Meta, which is the subject of twin lawsuits in the U.S. The Rohingya refugees are seeking unspecified reparations from the Menlo Park, California-based social media giant for its role in perpetuating genocide. This is because content moderation fails to address the root cause of Meta’s algorithmic amplification of harmful content,” Amnesty’s report says. “Even a well-resourced approach to content moderation, in isolation, would likely not have sufficed to prevent and mitigate these algorithmic harms. Wirathu had been banned from Facebook since 2018. The probe revealed that over 70% of the video’s views came from “chaining” - that is, it was suggested to people who played a different video, showing what’s “up next.” Facebook users were not seeking out or searching for the video, but had it fed to them by the platform’s algorithms. In 2020, for instance, three years after the violence in Myanmar killed thousands of Rohingya Muslims and displaced 700,000 more, Facebook investigated how a video by a leading anti-Rohingya hate figure, U Wirathu, was circulating on its site. In a statement, the company said it “stands in solidarity with the international community and supports efforts to hold the Tatmadaw accountable for its crimes against the Rohingya people.” “Meta - through its dangerous algorithms and its relentless pursuit of profit - substantially contributed to the serious human rights violations perpetrated against the Rohingya,” the report says.Ī spokesperson for Meta declined to answer questions about the Amnesty report. Myanmar security forces were accused of mass rapes, killings and torching thousands of homes owned by Rohingya. More than 700,000 Rohingya fled into neighboring Bangladesh that year. That effectively made Facebook the internet for a vast number of Myanmar’s population. The timing coincided with the rising popularity of Facebook in Myanmar, where for many people it served as their only connection to the online world. Mexican-born filmmaker fears losing hope if DACA thrown outĭespite years of warnings, Amnesty found, the company not only failed to remove violent hate speech and disinformation against the Rohingya, it actively spread and amplified it until it culminated in the 2017 massacre. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |